THE SYNOPTIC PROBLEM
 |
 |
 |
 |
Wisdom is the principal thing. It is more precious than rubies, silver and gold. The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom and the knowledge of the holy is understanding. Pro.9.10
:
Jesus Christ is
the same
yesterday,
today and
forever.
Heb:13:8:
 |
 |
COPYRIGHT NEIL CADMAN B'Sc.(Arch.) B Arch. M.Rel.Ed.
ARE THERE ERRORS IN THE BIBLE?
ARE THERE CONTRADICTIONS OR ERRORS IN THE GOSPELS?
IS THERE LITERARY DEPENDENCY IN THE GOSPELS: COPYING?
ARE THERE ERRORS IN THE BIBLE?
ARE THERE CONTRADICTIONS OR ERRORS IN THE GOSPELS?
IS THERE LITERARY DEPENDENCY IN THE GOSPELS: COPYING?
Update. 6:5:10
Double click to edit
CLIMATE CHANGE?
Carbon is extracted from carbon dioxide in the atmosphere by plants via photosynthesis, joined to
living matter, then buried. Organic matter decomposes, the carbon oxidizes and eventually returns to
the atmosphere as carbon dioxide. No more carbon can be returned to the air than was once in it,
except that which was in organic life at creation and also that which is the result of outgassing from the
crust via volcanoes. Evolvers must obviously say the atmosphere was before any plants so ALL carbon
(other than some diamonds and that from outgassing) was at one time in the air. The creationist can
therefore say that, for the sake of the environment, the balance that existed at creation should be our
ultimate goal. Of course we cannot know what this was except to say that there most likely was a far
greater mass of plant life and therefore animal life and most of the carbon within this life is now trapped
in carbonate rocks. But the evolutionist, which presumably the majority of politicians are, are forced to
say that plant life came out of an atmosphere saturated with carbon dioxide, which then was transferred
into plant life. In which case where is the problem?
With all the hysteria associated with assumed global warming due to assumed increased carbon dioxide
in the atmosphere I would like to ask the question, Who is the fool? Those who are creating the new tax
laws on the basis of "destructive amounts of carbon dioxide in the air," or those who are paying for it?
Carbon is extracted from carbon dioxide in the atmosphere by plants via photosynthesis, joined to
living matter, then buried. Organic matter decomposes, the carbon oxidizes and eventually returns to
the atmosphere as carbon dioxide. No more carbon can be returned to the air than was once in it,
except that which was in organic life at creation and also that which is the result of outgassing from the
crust via volcanoes. Evolvers must obviously say the atmosphere was before any plants so ALL carbon
(other than some diamonds and that from outgassing) was at one time in the air. The creationist can
therefore say that, for the sake of the environment, the balance that existed at creation should be our
ultimate goal. Of course we cannot know what this was except to say that there most likely was a far
greater mass of plant life and therefore animal life and most of the carbon within this life is now trapped
in carbonate rocks. But the evolutionist, which presumably the majority of politicians are, are forced to
say that plant life came out of an atmosphere saturated with carbon dioxide, which then was transferred
into plant life. In which case where is the problem?
With all the hysteria associated with assumed global warming due to assumed increased carbon dioxide
in the atmosphere I would like to ask the question, Who is the fool? Those who are creating the new tax
laws on the basis of "destructive amounts of carbon dioxide in the air," or those who are paying for it?
 |
"The grass withereth, the flower fadeth: but the word of our God shall stand for ever." Isa:40:8:
THE SYNOPTIC PROBLEM SOLUTION
 |
BACK
NEXT